Allergic contact dermatitis caused by gold is rare, and only isolated
cases have been reported. Patch testing with gold may cause a long-las
ting reaction. The purpose of this study is to describe a well-studied
case of gold allergy caused by dental gold crowns. A gold-sensitized
patient and a non-sensitized control subject were examined using patch
tests, inimunohistochemistry, electron microscopy and blast transform
ation reactions. Sodium thiosulfate, auranofin and sodium thiomalate g
ave positive patch test reactions. Immunohistochemistry and electron m
icroscopy were performed from biopsies taken from allergic patch test
reactions caused by gold sodium thiosulfate 1 day and 17 days after ap
plying the patches, from normal skin and from a 17-day-old allergic pa
tch test reaction caused by ammonium persulfate. Down-regulation had t
aken place by 17 days in the allergic ammonium persulfate reaction, bu
t not in the 17-day allergic gold test reaction. The patient reacted t
o all but one of the gold-induced blast transformation tests, sodium c
hloroaurate being non-inductive. The non-sensitized control subject di
d not exhibit any reactions. In conclusion, gold sodium thiosulfate, g
old sodium thiomalate and auranofin can be used as patch test substanc
es for gold allergy, though long-lasting allergic patch test reactions
may develop. In vitro gold salt induced blast transformation is an al
ternative test for gold allergy. The slow down-regulation of the aller
gic patch test reactions needs to be studied further.