ORALLY-ADMINISTERED OMEPRAZOLE VERSUS INJECTION THERAPY IN THE PREVENTION OF REBLEEDING FROM PEPTIC-ULCER WITH VISIBLE VESSEL - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED STUDY
B. Bour et al., ORALLY-ADMINISTERED OMEPRAZOLE VERSUS INJECTION THERAPY IN THE PREVENTION OF REBLEEDING FROM PEPTIC-ULCER WITH VISIBLE VESSEL - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED STUDY, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique, 17(5), 1993, pp. 329-333
Endoscopic injection therapy significantly reduces the risk of bleedin
g relapse in patients with digestive hemorrhage due to peptic ulcers a
ssociated with a visible vessel. Profound and sustained acid inhibitio
n by proton pump inhibitors may generate optimal conditions for clotti
ng and prevent bleeding relapse. Over a one-year period, 52 patients p
resenting with digestive hemorrhage, in whom emergency endoscopy showe
d a peptic ulcer with a non-bleeding visible vessel, were enrolled in
a multicenter randomized study comparing oral omeprazole, 40 mg per da
y (n = 31) vs adrenaline (1:10 000) plus polidocano1 (1 %) injection a
ssociated with oral ranitidine 300 mg per day (n = 21). Rebleeding occ
urred in 15/52 (29 %) patients: 8/31 (26 %) in the omeprazole group wi
th 6 major hemorrhages (19 %), and in 7/21 (33 %) in the injection gro
up with 3 major hemorrhages (14 %); the differences were not significa
nt. No difference was observed between omeprazole and injection group
in terms of volume of transfused blood (2.03 +/- 1.5 vs 3.1 +/- 0.9 bl
ood units), need for hemostatic surgery (9.6 % vs 14.3 %), mortality (
19.3 % vs 14.3 %) and mean hospital stay (11.5 days both groups). This
study suggests that oral omeprazole, 40 mg per day, has an efficacy c
omparable to injection therapy in reducing the bleeding relapse from n
on bleeding peptic ulcers associated with visible vessel.