MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER AND INCREASING LEVELS OF SERUM CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN - EXPERIENCE WITH ZCE-025 AND IMMU-4 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES AND PROPOSED DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS
Yz. Patt et al., MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER AND INCREASING LEVELS OF SERUM CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN - EXPERIENCE WITH ZCE-025 AND IMMU-4 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES AND PROPOSED DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS, Cancer, 71(12), 1993, pp. 4293-4297
In an effort to identify the site of recurrent colorectal cancer in pa
tients with occult metastasis and increasing serum CEA levels, we cond
ucted two trials using monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) against CEA. The f
irst utilized Indium-111-labeled ZCE-025; an immunoglobulin G1 (IgG,)
anticarcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) antibody (Hybritech, San Diego
, CA). The second study used Tc-99m-labeled Fab' fragment of IMMU-4 (I
mmunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ). Eighteen patients were imaged with th
e ZCE-025 and 14 with the Tc-99m Fab'IMMU-4. True-positive scans, defi
ned as at least one correct correlation of the MoAb scan and surgical/
histologic findings, were observed in 12 of 15 patients undergoing exp
loration or biopsy using the ZCE-025 and 11 of 14 using the IMMU-4. Th
ere were no true-negative scans with the ZCE-025 and only 2 of 14 with
the IMMU-4. There were 3 false-positive scans with the ZCE-025 and 1
of 14 with IMMU-4. There were no false-negative scans with either ZCE-
025 or IMMU-4. Four (31%) of 13 patients undergoing exploration and im
aged with ZCE-025 and 5 (36%) of 14 imaged with IMMU-4 had complete tu
mor resection. Treatment decisions were affected in 3 (16%) of 18 ZCE-
025-imaged patients and 3 (21%) of 14 IMMU-4 ones. Two (14%) of 14 pat
ients imaged with IMMU-4 had negative MoAh scans and negative laparoto
mies. Despite these findings, it is not known whether such early detec
tion and resection will translate into improved survival rates. The au
thors suggest two randomized studies, one designed to ascertain the ro
le of MoAb added to blind exploratory laparotomy. In that study, patie
nts with increasing CEA levels and a negative workup will be randomize
d to an exploratory laparotomy preceded by MoAb anti-CEA scans or a st
raight exploratory laparotomy without the assistance of a MoAb anti-CE
A scan. Endpoints will be differences in complete resectability and su
rvival. A second study will examine the merits of blind exploratory la
parotomies. In that study, patients with increasing CEA levels and a n
egative workup would be randomized to MoAb imaging, exploratory laparo
tomy, and radioimmunoguided surgery, and the other cohort of patients
would continue to have conventional radiologic workup. Exploration in
this latter group would be performed only when indicated by radiologic
or endoscopic studies. The endpoint of the study would compare surviv
al in the two cohorts of patients. These two studies may ultimately se
ttle the debate regarding the correct approach to patients with occult
metastatic colorectal cancer and a increasing levels of serum CEA.