The Turing Test is a verbal-behavioral operational criterion of artifi
cial intelligence. If a machine can participate in question-and-answer
conversation adequately enough to deceive an intelligent interlocutor
, then it has intelligent information processing abilities. Robert M.
French has argued that recent discoveries in cognitive science about s
ubcognitive processes involving associational primings prove that the
Turing Test cannot provide a satisfactory criterion of machine intelli
gence, that Turing's prediction concerning the feasibility of building
machines to play the imitation game successfully is false, and that t
he test should be rejected as ethnocentric and incapable of measuring
kinds and degrees of nonhuman intelligence. But French's criticism is
flawed, because it requires Turing's sufficient conditional criterion
of intelligence to serve as a necessary condition. Turing's Test is de
fended against these objections, and French's claim that the test ough
t to be rejected because machines cannot pass it is deemed unscientifi
c, resting on the empirically unwarranted assumption that intelligent
machines are possible.