This paper examines the covariability of industry-level productivity s
hocks to ask whether these shocks could drive an aggregate real busine
ss cycle model. Following Hall's insight, productivity shocks are meas
ured by purging total factor productivity of its component that is spu
riously procyclical due to market power (or labor hoarding). Then the
covariability of these productivity shock series is examined in a dyna
mic factor-analysis model. Removing the spuriously procyclical compone
nt of TFP greatly reduces the covariability of productivity shocks, an
d the aggregate productivity shock estimates are only slightly procycl
ical. Therefore, the paper provides some direct evidence suggesting th
at aggregate productivity shocks are of little importance for explaini
ng aggregate output changes.