In this Article, Professor Langevoort examines the adaptive qualities
of Rule 10b-5 and how the rule has remained intact despite sweeping ch
anges in the intellectual and political landscapes in which it operate
s. In Professor Langevoort's view, Rule 10b-5s survival is largely due
to the flexibility of its language which has enabled the rule to embr
ace malleable social perceptions of the securities market and the secu
rities business. Professor Langevoort also addresses the question of w
hether Rule 10b-5 has outlived its usefulness and should therefore be
repealed and replaced by more precisely-drafted legislation. Professor
Langevoort concludes that Rule 10b-5s continued survival is indeed ap
propriate in light of society's incomplete understanding of how invest
ors make decisions. Professor Langevoort further concludes that a comp
lete revision of Rule 10b-5 is highly unlikely-in part because the amb
iguity of the rule's present language provides an attractive alternati
ve to the difficult risk-allocation decisions that would have to be ma
de by lawmakers informulating substitute legislation.