Jg. Hollowell et al., EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF INCONTINENCE AFTER BLADDER NECK RECONSTRUCTION IN EXSTROPHY AND EPISPADIAS, British Journal of Urology, 71(6), 1993, pp. 743-749
Twenty-five children with exstrophy/epispadias who had had at least on
e bladder neck operation (but no augmentation) for incontinence underw
ent cystometrography (CMG) and urethral pressure profile (UPP) studies
, The purpose of this study was to examine all components of lower uri
nary tract function and to determine how the properties of the bladder
and the properties of the bladder neck/urethra interacted to achieve
continence or to result in incontinence in the individual child. Exami
nation of detrusor function during filling revealed involuntary contra
ctions in 12 children and an end-fill pressure > 10 cm H2O in 8. Of th
e 21 children in whom voiding could be evaluated only 6 could initiate
a detrusor contraction. In the 18 incontinent children leak pressure
could be measured and was greater-than-or-equal-to 15 cm H2O in 12. Fi
ve of the 7 continent children also demonstrated at least one abnormal
ity in lower tract function. The maximum pressure of the UPP did not a
gree with the leak pressure and may not be a valid measure of the clos
ing pressure of the bladder neck/urethra in this patient population. D
etailed urodynamic investigation is necessary in these children to gui
de the next step of management and to evaluate objectively each form o
f treatment.