Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) scores in peripheral blood and pl
asma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were determined in 58 lung
cancer patients and compared with those of 22 healthy persons. who ser
ved as controls. In the control group we found LAP scores of 54 +/- 28
and CEA levels of 4 +/-3 ng/ml. The 97.7% confidence intervals are: L
AP score < 110 and CEA level < 10. In the patients with limted lung ca
ncer we found LAP scores of 152.4 +/-36.7 and CEA levels of 22.7 +/- 4
8 ng/ml. The 97.7% confidence intervals are: LAP score > 78.6 and CEA
level > 0. In the patients with extensive lung cancer we found LAP sco
res of 272 +/- 49 and CEA levels of 47.5 +/- 80.4 ng/ml. The 97.7% con
fidence intervals are: LAP score > 174 and CEA level > 0. The sensitiv
ity of each marker is discussed, here as percent of false-negative res
ults, denoted PFN, and meaning that with a chosen threshold for the ma
rker level, only PFN% of the patients with a given condition (e.g. ext
ensive lung cancer) might have a marker level less than the chosen thr
eshold and could therefore be assumed healthy. The sensitivity of the
LAP score is 0.05% PFN for the group of patients with extensive lung c
ancer, and we conclude that indeed LAP score < 110 indicates a very lo
w probability of having extensive malignancy. The sensitivity of the C
EA level is 32% PFN. The sensitivity of the LAP score to limited lung
cancer is 12% PFN for the group of patients with that condition compar
ed with 40% of CEA. The specificities of both LAP score and CEA levels
,expressed as percent of false-positive results in the control group,
are fair (2.3%), provided that the common conditions, other than cance
r, that elevate LAP score and/or CEA levels are well known and can be
eliminated by the physician. It is concluded that the LAP score is con
siderably more useful than the CEA level as a marker for extensive lun
g cancer.