D. Journois et al., CONTROL OF THE SUBSTITUTION FLUID INFUSION BY THE BLOOD REMOVAL RATE DURING PREOPERATIVE NORMOVOLEMIC HEMODILUTION, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 12(3), 1993, pp. 241-246
Twenty-one patients (mean age 46 +/- 13 years) due to undergo abdomina
l or ENT surgery, presumed to give rise to an important blood loss wer
e included in this study. None had any contraindication to the use of
normovolaemic haemodilution (NH). Mean initial haemocrit was 40.3 +/-
1.8%. Their estimated total blood volume was 4,867 +/- 857 ml. The pat
ients were anaesthetized with thiopentone, fentanyl, vecuronium or atr
acurium. Maintenance was carried out with isoflurane (0.5 % during NH)
. Usual haemodynamic monitoring was used throughout. The required haem
atocrit was decided on before starting NH. The amount of blood to be r
emoved was calculated with usual mathematical formulae. A radial arter
y cannula (n = 7), or a subclavian or femoral venous cannula (n = 14)
was used to remove blood, which was collected within a bag containing
CPC-adenine. Six % hydroxyethyl starch (Elohes (R)) was given through
a short venous cannula some distance from the first one. An antiparall
el double line set in a roller pump was used to carry out the NH. A me
an 1,341 +/- 405 ml of blood were withdrawn so as to reach a mean haem
atocrit of 30.6 +/- 2.4 %. NH was completed within 17 +/- 6 min. No ma
jor haemodynamic changes occurred during the procedure. No significant
differences were observed between expected and observed final haemato
crits. There was no effect of the volume of blood withdrawn on the err
or of haematrocrit prediction (0.5 +/- 0.3 %). However, a higher rate
of blood removal could increase this error. This easy-to-use device se
ems to provide fast and identical rates of blood removal and replaceme
nt. The expected haematocrit may thus be reached reliably, even if thi
s must be checked for the sake of safety.