This review examines the ethical problems of liver transplantation fro
m living parental donors regarding the main ethical principles. It app
ears that this method of transplantation is a new possibility offered
to patients that cannot be substracted from the parents' choice withou
t interfering with their liberty. Moreover, there is a social decisive
ness to ensure the offering of this option which is limited by the con
ditions of realisation, timing and personal situations of the parents.
The considerations of risks, benefits, advantages and prejudices betw
een donor and recipient show a favourable balance for this type of tra
nsplantation provided that adequate medical indications are respected.
However, the considerations of psychological cost and burden deserve
special attention and are detailed in this paper especially regarding
the motivations and the long-term effects on the donor. Futility and e
thical generalisation examinations favour such a procedure. Moral just
ice will generally be respected. The consideration of autonomy require
d special attention owing to the situation pressure upon the donor's c
onsent. Consent deserves adapted sollicitation according to variable s
ituations: whether the donor explicitly specifically wanted to donate
part of his liver or only required information. Excessive solicitation
of parents' participation to liver donation represents qualified ''fo
rced choice''; in some situations where the parents cannot effectively
refuse their participation, paternalistic action is ethically accepta
ble. A general procedure is proposed to ensure the psychological, lega
l and ethical protection of the donor and recipient.