Bs. Schwartz et al., DECREMENTS IN NEUROBEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE ASSOCIATED WITH MIXED EXPOSURE TO ORGANIC AND INORGANIC LEAD, American journal of epidemiology, 137(9), 1993, pp. 1006-1021
In 1990, 222 current employees of a chemical facility in the eastern U
nited States that manufactured tetraethyl lead were administered a neu
robehavioral test battery, tests of olfactory function and peripheral
vibration threshold, and questionnaires that assessed neuropsychiatric
symptoms. A cumulative variable of exposure to inorganic and organic
lead was derived from 12 years of personal industrial hygiene sampling
data and an occupational history interview that assessed work in each
of 29 exposure zones in the lead area. The range of assigned exposure
intensities in these 29 zones was 4-119 mug/m3 for organic lead and 1
-56 mug/m3 for inorganic lead. Cumulative lead exposure and exposure d
uration were defined as categorical variables (four groups) in multipl
e linear regression models. The adjusted mean differences in neurobeha
vioral test scores were estimated by comparing the average scores of t
he moderate, high, and highest exposure groups with the low exposure (
reference) group. After adjustment for premorbid intellectual ability,
age, race, and alcohol consumption, neurobehavioral test scores were
poorer as measures of both cumulative lead exposure and exposure durat
ion increased; many of the associations evidenced dose-response relati
ons. Associations were observed in most cognitive and functional domai
ns tested, but were most common in two domains: manual dexterity and v
erbal memory/learning. On the affected neuropsychologic measures, the
groups with the highest exposure averaged scores 5-22% lower than thos
e of the reference groups. Overall, the data revealed generally consis
tent and coherent associations between two measures of lead exposure a
nd poorer neurobehavioral test performance.