SMALL-CALIBER AFFERENT INPUTS PRODUCE A HETEROSYNAPTIC FACILITATION OF THE SYNAPTIC RESPONSES EVOKED BY PRIMARY AFFERENT A-FIBERS IN THE NEONATAL RAT SPINAL-CORD INVITRO
Swn. Thompson et al., SMALL-CALIBER AFFERENT INPUTS PRODUCE A HETEROSYNAPTIC FACILITATION OF THE SYNAPTIC RESPONSES EVOKED BY PRIMARY AFFERENT A-FIBERS IN THE NEONATAL RAT SPINAL-CORD INVITRO, Journal of neurophysiology, 69(6), 1993, pp. 2116-2128
1. The effect of brief primary afferent inputs on the amplitude and du
ration of the synaptic potentials evoked in ventral horn (VH) neurons
by the activation of other unconditioned primary afferents was studied
by current-clamp intracellular recording in the neonatal rat hemisect
ed spinal cord in vitro. Low-frequency ( 1 Hz) trains of stimulation w
ere applied to a lumbar dorsal root (Conditioning root) for 20-30 s. T
est excitatory synaptic potentials (EPSPs) were evoked by single elect
rical shocks applied to an adjacent Test dorsal root. 2. Test and Cond
itioning inputs were generated at stimulation strengths sufficient to
activate Abeta-, Adelta- and C-afferent fibers successively. At Adelta
- and C-fiber strength the EPSPs lasted for 4-6 s, and, during the rep
etitive Conditioning inputs, these summated to produce a progressively
incrementing cumulative depolarization that slowly decayed back to th
e control V(m) over tens of seconds. 3. Dorsal root conditioning produ
ced heterosynaptic facilitation, defined as an enhancement of Test EPS
Ps above their DC matched controls, in 7 out of 20 neurons. To facilit
ate the unconditioned afferent input, the intensity of conditioning st
imulation had to exceed the threshold for the activation of thin myeli
nated (Adelta) afferents: conditioning at Abeta-fiber strength had no
effect, whereas Adelta- and C-fiber strength conditioning were equally
effective. 4. Heterosynaptic facilitation of only Abeta- or Adelta-fi
ber-evoked Test EPSPs was observed, no enhancement of C-fiber strength
Test EPSPs could be demonstrated. The facilitation manifested as incr
eases in the EPSP peak amplitude, area or the number of action potenti
als evoked. 5. Conditioning trials that produced heterosynaptic facili
tation generated cumulative depolarizations larger than those produced
by ineffective conditioning trials (9.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 3.3. +/- 0.5 mV a
fter 20 s conditioning at resting V(m), mean +/- SE, n = 6 and 13, res
pectively; P < 0.05). The slope of the V(m) trajectory during the summ
ation of the conditioning EPSPs was higher in trials resulting in hete
rosynaptic facilitation, at 0.31 +/- 0. 10 mV/s in neurons with hetero
synaptic facilitation and 0.06 +/- 0.02 mV/s in cells without heterosy
naptic facilitation (P < 0.05). 5. Four of the 20 VH neurons in our sa
mple responded to Adelta/C-fiber conditioning with action-potential wi
ndup: all 4 also displayed heterosynaptic facilitation. 6. Heterosynap
tic facilitation decayed after the completion of the conditioning stim
ulus with a time course that was parallel to but not superimposable on
that of the slow V(m) depolarization evoked by the conditioning. The
duration of Test EPSP facilitation varied between 45 and 180 s. 7. Rep
etitive stimulation of thin myelinated and unmyelinated primary affere
nts, even for short periods at a low frequency, enhanced neuronal resp
onses to low-intensity stimulation of unconditioned inputs. This heter
osynaptic facilitation has features in common with the central sensiti
zation of spinal neurons that contributes to postinjury pain hypersens
itivity. Further investigation into the cellular mechanisms of heteros
ynaptic facilitation will contribute to the understanding of use-depen
dent synaptic plasticity in the spinal cord and its involvement in sen
sory disturbances.