STUDIES EVALUATING HIGH-DOSE ACYCLOVIR, INTRAVENOUS IMMUNE GLOBULIN, AND CYTOMEGALOVIRUS HYPERIMMUNOGLOBULIN FOR PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST CYTOMEGALOVIRUS IN KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
Bi. Dickinson et al., STUDIES EVALUATING HIGH-DOSE ACYCLOVIR, INTRAVENOUS IMMUNE GLOBULIN, AND CYTOMEGALOVIRUS HYPERIMMUNOGLOBULIN FOR PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST CYTOMEGALOVIRUS IN KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 30(12), 1996, pp. 1452-1464
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and pathogenesis of cytomegalo
virus (CMV) and critically analyze the studies evaluating the cost, sa
fety, and efficacy of high-dose acyclovir, intravenous immune globulin
(IVIG), and CMV hyperimmunoglobulin (CMVIG) for prophylaxis against C
MV in kidney transplant recipients. DATA SOURCES: Appropriate articles
were identified by searching MEDLINE, Various combinations of the fol
lowing medical subject heading terms were used: immunoglobulins, intra
venous acyclovir; CMVIG; CMV infections; kidney transplantation: IVIG;
and prophylaxis. STUDY SELECTION: Studies evaluating or discussing th
e cost, safety, and efficacy of IVIG, high-dose acyclovir, and CMVIG i
n kidney transplant recipients were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The dat
a were evaluated with respect to study design, patient population, pro
phylactic regimen, incidence of CMV complications, investigators' defi
nitions of terminology, and cost analysis. The studies are summarized
in cables and discussed in the test. DATA SYNTHESIS: The definitions o
f terminology used by; the investigators varied widely among studies.
The studies were reviewed and discussed using the following definition
s: CMV infection was the presence of CMV antibodies in a previously CM
V-seronegative patient or a fourfold rise in antibody titer after tran
splantation; CMV syndrome was CMV infection plus unexplained fever, le
ukopenia, or thrombocytopenia in the absence of an identifiable cause:
and CMV disease was CMV syndrome plus pneumonitis, enteritis, retinit
is, hepatitis. or central nervous system involvement. CONCLUSIONS: All
regimens appear to effectively reduce the incidence of CMV-associated
complications compared with placebo. Due to the lack of trials compar
ing cost, efficacy, and safety, the most effective prophylactic treatm
ent is unknown.