CORRECTION FACTORS FOR A CYLINDRICAL IONIZATION-CHAMBER USED IN MEDIUM-ENERGY X-RAY-BEAMS

Citation
J. Seuntjens et al., CORRECTION FACTORS FOR A CYLINDRICAL IONIZATION-CHAMBER USED IN MEDIUM-ENERGY X-RAY-BEAMS, Physics in medicine and biology, 38(6), 1993, pp. 805-832
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
00319155
Volume
38
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
805 - 832
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9155(1993)38:6<805:CFFACI>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
In this paper correction factors are derived for a cylindrical NE2571 ionization chamber, for absorbed dose determinations in medium-energy x-rays. These new correction factors are proposed as weighted mean val ues of the factors derived from two methods. The first method is based on a comparative study of dosimetry of medium-energy x-rays with the cylindrical ionization chamber and a water calorimeter. The calorimetr ic results show that when the ionization chamber, calibrated free in a ir, is used to measure the absorbed dose in a water phantom, solely ap plying mass energy absorption coefficient ratios for the conversion, t he ratio of the absorbed dose calorimetry to ionometry is 1.007 +/- 0. 015 at 250 kV (HVL: 2.5 mm Cu), 1.026 +/- 0.018 at 150 kV (HVL: 0.82 m m Cu) and 1.040 +/- 0.020 at 100 kV (HVL: 4.54 mm Al). The second meth od is based on an experimental investigation of the NE2571 ionization chamber in connection with Monte Carlo calculations. Using this method three components in the overall correction factor are investigated: t he effect of the displaced volume, the combined angular-energy depende nce of the chamber response within the water phantom and the stem corr ection. The values of the correction factors derived from this investi gation were within the uncertainties, in agreement with the values fro m the first method and varied from 1.015 +/- 0.010 at 2.50 kV (HVL: 2. 5 mm Cu) to 1.019 +/- 0.010 at 100 kV (HVL: 4.54 mm Al) with a maximum of 1.025 +/- 0.010 at 150 kV (HVL: 0.82 mm Cu). The correction factor s, obtained as a weighted mean of the two methods, are systematically lower than the values proposed in the IAEA TRS-227 report.