MORTALITY AND INCIDENCE OF CANCER AMONG SEWAGE WORKERS - A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Citation
L. Friis et al., MORTALITY AND INCIDENCE OF CANCER AMONG SEWAGE WORKERS - A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY, British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 50(7), 1993, pp. 653-657
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00071072
Volume
50
Issue
7
Year of publication
1993
Pages
653 - 657
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1072(1993)50:7<653:MAIOCA>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
To study the incidence of and mortality from cancer among sewage worke rs a retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 656 men emplo yed for at least one year at any one of 17 Swedish sewage plants durin g the years 1965-86. Assessment of exposure was done by classification of work tasks. Lower than expected total mortality (standardised mort ality ratio (SMR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.58-0.97) and cardiovascular mortality (SMR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.91) was found. This was interpreted as a result of the healthy worker effect. For al l cancers combined the mortality (SMR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.68-1.67) and mo rbidity (SMR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.72-1.38) were comparable with those of t he general population. There were increased incidences for brain tumou rs (SMR = 2.19, 95% CI 0.45-6.39), gastric cancers (SMR = 2.73, 95% CI , 1.00-5.94), and renal cancers (SMR = 1.68, 95% CI = 0.35-4.90). For lung cancer the risk was reduced (SMR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.15-2.05). Allow ance for a latency period of 10 years from the start of exposure did n ot change the pattern. Logistic modelling was used to search for expos ure-response relations. In a logistic model with the confounder age fo rced in, renal cancer had a significant positive relation with a weigh ted sum of employment times, where the weights describe the classifica tion of exposure. No exposure-response relations were found for brain tumours or gastric cancers. The increased risks are based on small num bers of cases. A future follow up will add more conclusive power to th e study. Specific exposures need to be identified to allow for a bette r dose-response analysis.