ACETYLCHOLINE-INDUCED CONSTRICTION OF ANGIOGRAPHICALLY NORMAL CORONARY-ARTERIES IS NOT TIME-DEPENDENT IN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS - EFFECTS OFSTEPWISE INFUSION AT 1, 6, 12 AND MORE THAN 24 MONTHS AFTER TRANSPLANTATION
A. Nitenberg et al., ACETYLCHOLINE-INDUCED CONSTRICTION OF ANGIOGRAPHICALLY NORMAL CORONARY-ARTERIES IS NOT TIME-DEPENDENT IN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS - EFFECTS OFSTEPWISE INFUSION AT 1, 6, 12 AND MORE THAN 24 MONTHS AFTER TRANSPLANTATION, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22(1), 1993, pp. 151-158
Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether acetylcholin
e may be a useful tool for detection of early angiographically undetec
table coronary atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients. Backgro
und. Coronary artery disease is the main determinant of long-term prog
nosis in transplant recipients. Acetylcholine-induced constriction of
angiographically normal coronary arteries in heart transplant recipien
ts could be due to early atherosclerosis, and acetylcholine has been p
roposed for early detection of coronary artery disease. Methods. The r
esponses of large coronary arteries to stepwise intracoronary infusion
of acetylcholine (10(-8) to 10(-5) mol/liter) were compared in five c
ontrol subjects and in four groups of transplant recipients 1, 6, 12 a
nd > 24 months postoperatively (group 1, n = 6; group 2, n = 7; group
3, n = 6; group 4, n = 6, respectively). All patients had normal coron
ary arteriographic findings. Vessel dimensions were measured in four s
egments in each patient. Results. In control subjects, acetylcholine i
ncreased diameters significantly at 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/lite
r (all p < 0.001 vs. basal value). No significant variation was observ
ed at 10(-5) mol/liter. Intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate increased d
iameters of all segments (p < 0.001). In transplant recipients, vessel
diameters did not vary significantly from baseline at 10(-8) and 10(-
7) mol/liter concentrations in groups 1 and 3 and at 10(-8) mol/liter
in group 4. Vessels constricted significantly in all the other cases.
Comparisons of each group with control subjects showed that responses
were significantly different for all concentrations but 10(-8) mol/lit
er in groups 3 and 4. Intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate elicited coro
nary vasodilation similar to that of control subjects in all groups of
transplant recipients. Conclusions. This study indicates that the ace
tylcholine response is persistently abnormal in transplant recipients
compared with that in normal control subjects and that this abnormalit
y may not be related simply to the presence of atherosclerosis. Thus,
acetylcholine may not be a useful tool for early detection of coronary
atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients.