H. Lardoux et al., TREATMENT OF CHRONIC VENTRICULAR EXTRASYS TOLES BY PROPAFENONE (600 MG D) IN 2 OR 3 DAILY SUBDOSES/, Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie, 42(5), 1993, pp. 281-288
The efficacy of propafenone by oral route in the treatment of chronic
ventricular extrasystoles (VES) was investigated in 14 subjects in the
context of a multicenter evaluation carried out double blind and usin
g a crossover sequence. The purpose of this study was to compare the a
ntiarrythmic efficacy of a dose of 600 mg/d of propafenone randomly di
vided into two or three subdoses. After carrying out two Holter record
ings (< 15 days) the patients presenting with chronic (less-than-or-eq
ual-to 100 VES/H) and stable (interindividual variability greater-than
-or-equal-to 30 %) ventricular extrasystoles were included. The treatm
ent period consisted of two 8-day courses divided by a placebo period
and carried out following a crossover mode. The efficacy of treatment
was defined as a reduction in the VES by at least 70 % relative to the
second Holter during the inclusion period which was used as the refer
ence period. Fourteen patients (57.2 +/- 18.2 years) from eight cardio
logical centers (eight with heart disease) were included. In general,
propafenone at a dose of 600 mg/d bid or tid significantly reduced the
total number of VES by about 65 % : 15239 +/- 2663 VES/24 h (baseline
) to 5238 +/- 2746 VES/24 h (bid) and 5765 +/- 2683 VES/24 h (tid) ; p
< 0.0001, with no significant difference between the bid and tid trea
tments. Individually, 8 patients (57 %) responded during the bid treat
ment, 7 patients (50 %) during the tid treatment and 6 patients during
both treatments. Of the nine patients presenting with a significant d
oublet rate, the global number was reduced : 168.4 +/- 214/24 h (basel
ine) to 33.9 +/- 53.8/24 h (bid) and 173 +/- 584.4/24 h (tid) but with
no significant difference relative to the control period. Individuall
y, in about half of the patients, the doublet rate was significantly r
educed (greater-than-or-equal-to 90 % complex VES). No proarrythmic ef
fect was observed. The cardiovascular side effects were moderate and i
t was never necessary to discontinue propafenone. This study confirms
the antiarrythmic efficacy of propafenone in the treatment of chronic
VES in about two thirds of patients at a daily dose of 600 mg with sim
ilar efficacy bid and tid.