Discussion of Oosterhuis's article acknowledges several beneficial poi
nts. The historical framework demonstrates the connection between the
child's role in society and disciplinary practices. The distinction be
tween paidion and pais is touched upon as an important developmental d
elineation. Christ's perception of the personhood of children is elabo
rated. Critique emphasizes the New Testament elaboration of Old Testam
ent themes rather than the radical change, the incomplete interpretati
on of research on childrearing, and the need to replace rather than ab
olish the rod.