E. Wilander et L. Scheibenpflug, CYTOKERATIN EXPRESSION IN SMALL-INTESTINAL AND APPENDICEAL CARCINOIDS- A BASIS FOR CLASSIFICATION, Acta oncologica, 32(2), 1993, pp. 131-134
For a study of histogenesis of intestinal carcinoids a collection of 5
classical small intestinal carcinoids, 6 appendiceal carcinoids and 9
pheochromocytomas, were evaluated. The tumors were identified by rout
ine morphology, silver staining and chromogranin immunocytochemistry a
nd were then examined with regard to the expression of intermediate fi
laments of cytokeratin type. Eight different antisera identifying indi
vidual or combinations of cytokeratins were employed. All classical sm
all intestinal carcinoids displayed cytokeratin immunoreactivity and a
n almost identical cytokeratin reaction was observed in the normal ent
erocytes of the small intestinal mucosa. Of the individual cytokeratin
types, number 18 was most heavily expressed. The appendiceal carcinoi
ds, like the pheochromocytomas, almost totally lacked a cytokeratin st
aining despite a positive reaction in the mucosa of the appendix. This
, in agreement with some previous studies, indicates that the small in
testinal carcinoids are histogenetically related to the epithelial cel
ls of the intestinal mucosa, while the appendiceal carcinoids have a d
ifferent histogenesis and are more like pheochromocytomas. The appendi
ceal carcinoid may represent a distinct type of intestinal paraganglio
ma. This offers one explanation for the different biological behavior
of appendiceal carcinoids in comparison with the other intestinal carc
inoids.