Services for children with diabetes are a good model for audit because
of relatively well-defined and available measures of outcome. Estimat
ion of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1) is accepted as one index of control
, although the assay and normal ranges vary in different centres. Shef
field has a stable clinic population and we have taken blood for HbA1
on each patient two to four times per year since 1983. HbA1 values hav
e been aligned in 3-monthly increments from time of diagnosis to const
ruct a graph showing the mean plus or minus two standard deviation val
ues for the clinic population and also a rough 'centile chart' that de
scribes the unfortunate but expected pattern of deteriorating control
with duration of diabetes. There are undoubtedly methodological flaws
in this novel approach; however, such charts constructed for each clin
ic may be a suitable basis for comparative assessment of the control o
f an individual and also for auditing the effects of changes in practi
ce that strive for optimum glucose levels in the clinic population.