OLSALAZINE VERSUS SULFASALAZINE IN MILD-TO-MODERATE CHILDHOOD ULCERATIVE-COLITIS - RESULTS OF THE PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH GROUP CLINICAL-TRIAL
Gd. Ferry et al., OLSALAZINE VERSUS SULFASALAZINE IN MILD-TO-MODERATE CHILDHOOD ULCERATIVE-COLITIS - RESULTS OF THE PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH GROUP CLINICAL-TRIAL, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 17(1), 1993, pp. 32-38
The safety and efficacy of olsalazine sodium was compared to sulfasala
zine over 3 months in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of
56 children with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Twenty-eight ch
ildren received 30 mg/kg/day of olsalazine (maximum, 2 g/day) and 28 r
eceived 60 mg/kg/day of sulfasalazine (maximum, 4 g/day). Side effects
were frequent in both groups. Eleven of 28 patients (39%) on olsalazi
ne reported headache, nausea, vomiting, rash, pruritus. increased diar
rhea, and/or fever. Thirteen of 28 on sulfasalazine (46%) reported sim
ilar side effects and/or neutropenia, and four patients had the drug s
topped because of an adverse reaction. After 3 months, 11 of 28 (39%)
on olsalazine were asymptomatic or clinically improved, compared to 22
of 28 (79%) on sulfasalazine (p = 0.006). In addition, 10 of 28 patie
nts on olsalazine versus one on sulfasalazine required prednisone beca
use of lack of response or worsening of colitis (p = 0.005). The dose
of olsalazine used in this clinical trial was thought to be equivalent
to a standard dose of sulfasalazine, but fewer patients on olsalazine
improved and a greater number had progression of symptoms when compar
ed to sulfasalazine. Although side effects were slightly less frequent
for olsalazine, the number of patients was too small to detect a clin
ically significant difference.