SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENCES IN SMOKING IN AN URBAN SWEDISH POPULATION -THE BIAS INTRODUCED BY NONPARTICIPATION IN A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE

Citation
G. Bostrom et al., SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENCES IN SMOKING IN AN URBAN SWEDISH POPULATION -THE BIAS INTRODUCED BY NONPARTICIPATION IN A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE, Scandinavian journal of social medicine, 21(2), 1993, pp. 77-82
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
03008037
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
77 - 82
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-8037(1993)21:2<77:SDISIA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Stockholm Health of the Population Study is a cross-sectional study ca rried out from 1984-85. Postal questionnaires, telephone interviews an d health interviews were used to get information from a sample of 5,19 9 persons, 18-64 years of age, on health status, risk exposures, healt h-care consumption and social factors. Non-participation with respect to the postal questionnaire was 36.8%. With subsequent telephone inter views and an invitation to a health interview, non-participation was r educed to 17.8%. The estimated prevalence of daily smoking increased f rom 36.1% to 38.7. The non-responders had a higher prevalence of daily smoking in all sub-groups. This effect of the efforts to reduce non-p articipation differed socially. The prevalence of smoking for men, 40- 64 years of age, who were reached by telephone was 60.3%. Male profess ionals and intermediate non-manual workers, 40-64 years of age reached by telephone had a prevalence of smoking, which was twice as high as for the responders of the questionnaire (62.5 and 26.8%, respectively) . In the younger age-group, non-responders had the same socioeconomic pattern in smoking as the responders. Independent of socioeconomic gro up, there was a tendency of ill or disabled smokers to respond more qu ickly than healthy smokers. Using a postal questionnaire with a high n on-response rate might lead to an overestimation of socioeconomic diff erences and an underestimation of smoking prevalence.