In past issues of the Harvard Journal on Legislation, authors have del
ved into the persistent problem of asbestos litigation. In Volume 20,
Louis Treiger explored legislative proposals before the Ninety-Seventh
Congress in his article, Relief for Asbestos Victims: A Legislative A
nalysis. Bruce H. Nielson's note in Volume 25 explored the potential o
f class actions to address the needs of victims of asbestos and other
mass forts. In this Article, Harvard Law Professors Edley and Weiler r
evisit the asbestos litigation problem and suggest new solutions. Reje
cting traditional legal strategies as unworkable, the authors propose
a legislative approach that combines the scope of a class action with
the consistency of an administrative system. Their proposal envisions
a central fund to which claimants can apply without the need to show f
ault. Clear medical guidelines are applied, and damage awards and lega
l fees are strictly controlled. Finally, the authors suggest administr
ative and judicial alternatives that closely resemble the legislative
ideal, should legislation be politically impossible.