DO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE EXPERTS HOLD PRO-CHILD BELIEFS - A SURVEY OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TRAUMATIC STRESS STUDIES

Citation
Mb. Kovera et al., DO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE EXPERTS HOLD PRO-CHILD BELIEFS - A SURVEY OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TRAUMATIC STRESS STUDIES, Journal of traumatic stress, 6(3), 1993, pp. 383-404
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
Journal title
ISSN journal
08949867
Volume
6
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
383 - 404
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-9867(1993)6:3<383:DCSAEH>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
As psychologists become increasingly involved in child sexual abuse ca ses, professional concerns have been expressed about their partisan or ientation as child advocates. A survey was administered to examine the beliefs about child sexual abuse and children's capabilities as witne sses held by a sample (N = 340) from the International Society for Tra umatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). Multivariate analyses of variance sugge st that female ISTSS members generally have stronger beliefs in the cr edibility of child witnesses than male members. Additionally, ISTSS me mbers who work with victims of sexual assault generally have stronger beliefs in the credibility of children than members who work with vete rans or other sufferers of traumatic stress reactions. Moreover, ISTSS members from southern geographical regions are less likely than respo ndents from other regions to endorse items in a manner that has favora ble implications for a child witness. Beliefs of ISTSS respondents do not differ as a function of their educational background. Implications for the role of child sexual abuse experts in the legal system are di scussed.