Three experiments determine whether memory difficulties experienced by
learning-disabled readers may be attributable, in part, to executive
processing. In Experiment 1, learning-disabled readers. matched to ski
lled readers on chronological age and reading-comprehension ability, w
ere compared on the Concurrent Digit Span measure presented under high
(6-digit) and low (3-digit) memory-load conditions as they concurrent
ly sorted cards into verbal or nonverbal categories. Experiment 2 util
ized the same task as Experiment 1, except that learning-disabled (LD)
readers of low and average working-memory capacity were compared with
skilled readers of average and high working-memory capacity. Both exp
eriments clearly showed that LD readers' performance is depressed unde
r high memory-load conditions. Experiment 2 also indicated that overal
l performance of non-learning-disabled (NLD) readers was predictable f
rom LD readers, suggesting that ability-group differences are related
to global processing efficiency rather than to isolated verbal and non
verbal systems. In Experiment 3, LD and NLD readers were compared on t
heir ability to recall central and secondary information from base and
elaborative sentences tasks under high- and low-effort encoding condi
tions. LD readers had significantly poorer secondary recall during hig
h-effort encoding conditions when compared to skilled readers. Taken t
ogether, the results are discussed within a framework that views indiv
idual differences in reading comprehension as reflecting, in part, exe
cutive processing (i.e., resource monitoring) activities.