CLINICAL, ANGIOGRAPHIC, AND PROCEDURAL DETERMINANTS OF MAJOR AND MINOR CORONARY DISSECTION DURING ANGIOPLASTY

Citation
Sk. Sharma et al., CLINICAL, ANGIOGRAPHIC, AND PROCEDURAL DETERMINANTS OF MAJOR AND MINOR CORONARY DISSECTION DURING ANGIOPLASTY, The American heart journal, 126(1), 1993, pp. 39-47
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
00028703
Volume
126
Issue
1
Year of publication
1993
Pages
39 - 47
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8703(1993)126:1<39:CAAPDO>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Angiographic evidence of coronary dissection after angioplasty is foun d in 25% to 30% of cases. Although patients are usually asymptomatic, in a small percentage angioplasty-induced coronary dissection results in luminal impairment and ischemic complications. The present study wa s undertaken to identify factors responsible for a predisposition to c oronary dissection after angioplasty and to determine whether major an d minor dissections share the same underlying risk factors. Clinical r ecords and angiograms from 363 patients with 489 lesions were retrospe ctively graded for the presence and severity of dissection and complic ations. Both major and minor angiographic dissections were noted in 30 .3%, and in 8.8% they were major. On multivariate analysis the most si gnificant correlates of any dissection included a balloon-to-artery ra tio >1.1 (p = 0.0001), calcification (p = 0.003), presence of other le sions in the angioplasty vessel (p = 0.018), and lesion length (p = 0. 02). However, in a multivariate model there were no variables that cou ld predict whether a dissection would be major or minor. Only the mean total number of inflations was significantly different, but this was likely the result rather than the cause of dissection. Thus a number o f variables can predict the occurrence of angiographic coronary dissec tion after angioplasty. Major dissections constitute a small fraction of the total number but are difficult to predict differentially.