Ar. Formiconi, LEAST-SQUARES ALGORITHM FOR REGION-OF-INTEREST EVALUATION IN EMISSIONTOMOGRAPHY, IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 12(1), 1993, pp. 90-100
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Biomedical","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
In a simulation study, the performances of the least squares algorithm
applied to region-of-interest evaluation were studied. The least squa
res algorithm is a direct algorithm which does not require any iterati
ve computation scheme and also provides estimates of statistical uncer
tainties of the region-of-interest values (covariance matrix). A model
of physical factors, such as system resolution, attenuation and scatt
er, can be specified in the algorithm. In this paper an accurate model
of the non-stationary geometrical response to a camera-collimator sys
tem was considered. The algorithm was compared with three others which
are specialized for region-of-interest evaluation, as well as with th
e conventional method of summing the reconstructed quantity over the r
egions of interest. For the latter method, two algorithms were used fo
r image reconstruction; these included filtered backprojection and con
jugate gradient least squares with the model of nonstationary geometri
cal response. For noise-free data and for regions of accurate shape le
ast squares estimates were unbiased within roundoff errors. For noisy
data, estimates were still unbiased but precision worsened for regions
smaller than resolution: simulating typical statistics of brain perfu
sion studies performed with a collimated camera, the estimated standar
d deviation for a 1 cm square region was 10% with an ultra high-resolu
tion collimator and 7% with a low energy all purpose collimator. Conve
ntional region-of-interest estimates showed comparable precision but w
ere heavily biased if filtered backprojection was employed for image r
econstruction. Using the conjugate gradient iterative algorithm and th
e model of nonstationary geometrical response, bias of estimates decre
ased on increasing the number of iterations, but precision worsened th
us achieving an estimated standard deviation of more than 25% for the
same 1 cm region.