This study examined viewer judgments about the readability and studyab
ility of two sets of computer screens: a set of model displays and a s
et of real screens copied from CAI programs. The purpose was to identi
fy constructs that could guide the design of computer screens used to
display information in computer-assisted instruction, hypermedia, or o
n-line help applications. It also searched for any relationships among
viewer preference and viewer field articulation (field-dependence/ind
ependence), conceptual style (relational/analytical), and gender. Find
ings based on multidimensional scaling techniques confirmed and furthe
r defined the existence of evaluative constructs based on visual compl
exity and organization. No generalizable effects for field articulatio
n, conceptual style, or gender differences were found.