DETECTION OF DIFFERENT ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR FORMS IN BREAST-CANCER CYTOSOL BY ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY

Citation
R. Dittadi et al., DETECTION OF DIFFERENT ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR FORMS IN BREAST-CANCER CYTOSOL BY ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY, Cancer research, 57(6), 1997, pp. 1066-1072
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00085472
Volume
57
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1066 - 1072
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-5472(1997)57:6<1066:DODEFI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Estrogen receptors (ER) are routinely measured in tissue extracts from breast cancer using a radioligand binding assay (RBA) and an enzyme i mmunoassay (EIA). Although good correlation was found between the two methods, they are expected to measure, at least in part, different ER amounts in individual samples, because the RBA should detect unfilled ER only, whereas EIA should recognize both unfilled receptors and thos e filled by endogenous estrogens, The purpose of the present investiga tion was to evaluate if ER-EIA mainly detects ER filled by endogenous estrogens when using an estrogen-free buffer to dilute cytosol samples . Indeed, the commercially available EIA assay kit (ER-EIA; Abbott) is equipped with a sample dilution buffer containing a high concentratio n of 17 beta-estradiol which should allow for the saturation of all th e ERs. ER was measured in 57 cytosol samples from primary breast cance r with RBA and ER-EIA. In the latter case, samples were diluted using both the estradiol-rich dilution buffer of the kit and an estrogen-fre e low salt phosphate buffer. RBA and ER-ELA showed tightly correlated results. However, ER-EIA detected higher ER levels than RBA in the maj ority of cases, Results obtained by low salt ER-EIA were also correlat ed to both RBA and ER-EIA, showing, however, lower ER concentrations. ER levels measured by ER-EIA were not significantly different from the sum of ER concentrations found by RBA and low salt ER-EIA. These find ings suggest that ER-EIA detects ER only in the conformational status that is achieved after saturation by estrogens. These findings were co nfirmed by sedimentation shift experiments, which showed that the mono clonal antibody D547 used in the kit binds ER in the occupied form onl y, This leads to the conclusion that ER-EIA detects functioning (in te rms of binding with estradiol) ERs. From the present investigation, we suggest that it is possible and probably worthwhile to optimize the E IA method by using different buffers to measure: (a) the total number of ERs capable of binding estradiol; (b) the ER filled by endogenous e strogens; and (c) by difference, the unfilled ER concentrations.