Ml. Meistrich et al., PROTECTION FROM PROCARBAZINE-INDUCED TESTICULAR DAMAGE BY HORMONAL PRETREATMENT DOES NOT INVOLVE ARREST OF SPERMATOGONIAL PROLIFERATION, Cancer research, 57(6), 1997, pp. 1091-1097
Hormone treatments that suppress sperm production enhance the recovery
of spermatogenesis after gonadal exposure to various cytotoxic agents
, It has generally been assumed that the mechanism of protection invol
ved an arrest of spermatogonial kinetics. To test this hypothesis crit
ically, we examined spermatogonial kinetics and numbers in rats in whi
ch the completion of spermatogenesis was suppressed with a 6-week test
osterone plus 17 beta-estradiol treatment that protected the testis fr
om procarbazine-induced damage. Histological examination showed that t
he numbers of A-aligned, intermediate, and B spermatogonia and prelept
otene spermatocytes and their mitoses were unaffected by testosterone
plus 17 beta-estradiol treatment. Flow cytometric analysis of bromodeo
xyuridine-labeled cells showed that the percentage of diploid cells un
dergoing DNA synthesis, the progression of B spermatogonia and prelept
otene spermatocytes through S-phase, the division of intermediate and
B spermatogonia, the entry of intermediate spermatogonia into their ne
xt S-phase as type B cells, and the progression of cells through meiot
ic prophase were either unchanged or very slightly increased, Thus, ch
anges in spermatogonial numbers or suppression of their proliferation
cannot account for protection of spermatogenesis from exposure to cyto
toxic agents.