One of the basic assumptions central to the analysis of capture-recapt
ure experiments is that all marked animals remain in the population un
der study for the duration of the sampling, or if they migrate out of
the population they do so permanently. Burnham (1993, in Marked Indivi
duals in the Study of Bird Populations, 199-213), Kendall and Nichols
(1995, Applied Statistics 22, 751-762), and Kendall, Nichols, and Hine
s (in press) showed that completely random temporary emigration influe
nces only estimates of the probability of capture, these now estimatin
g the product of the temporary emigration rate and the conditional pro
bability of capture given the animal. remains in the population. Estim
ates of abundance or survival that refer to the entire population, inc
luding the temporary emigrants, remain unaffected. Kendall et al. (in
press) further showed that Pollock's (1982, Journal of Wildlife Manage
ment 46, 757-760) robust design could be used to estimate the temporar
y emigration rate when the population was assumed closed during the se
condary samples. We generalize this result to allow animals to enter a
nd leave the population during the secondary samples. We apply the res
ults to a study of Grey Seals and perform simulation experiments to as
sess the robustness of our estimator to errors in field identification
of brands and other violations of our assumptions.