This paper focuses on methods of analysis of areas under receiver oper
ating characteristic (ROC) curves. Analysis of ROC areas should incorp
orate the correlation structure of repeated measurements taken on the
same set of cases and the paucity of measurements per treatment result
ing from an effective summarization of cases into a few area measures
of diagnostic accuracy. The repeated nature of ROC data has been taken
into consideration in the analysis methods previously suggested by Sw
ets and Pickett (1982, Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from
Signal Detection Theory), Hanley and McNeil (1983, Radiology 148, 839-
843), and DeLong, DeLong;, and Clarke-Pearson (1988, Biometrics 44, 83
7-845). DeLong et al.'s procedure is extended to a Wald test for gener
al situations of diagnostic testing. The method of analyzing jackknife
pseudovalues by treating them as data is extremely useful when the nu
mber of area measures to be tested is quite small. The Wald test based
on covariances of multivariate multisample U-statistics is compared w
ith two approaches of analyzing pseudovalues, the univariate mixed-mod
el analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements and the thre
e-way factorial ANOVA. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the th
ree tests give good approximation to the nominal size at the 5% levels
for large sample sizes, but the paired t-test using ROC areas as data
lacks the power of the other three tests and Hanley and McNeil's meth
od is inappropriate for testing diagnostic accuracies. The Wald statis
tic performs better than the ANOVAs of pseudovalues. Jackknifing schem
es of multiple deletion where different structures of normal and disea
sed distributions are accounted for appear to perform slightly better
than simple multiple-deletion schemes but no appreciable power differe
nce is apparent, and deletion of too many cases at a time may sacrific
e power. These methods have important applications in diagnostic testi
ng in ROC studies of radiology and of medicine in general.