Objective: CD4 counts have been used to monitor progression of disease
in HIV infection as criteria for initiation of therapy, and to strati
fy and follow patients in clinical trials. Recently, the Centers for D
isease Control and Prevention (CDC) has made CD4 counts part of the cl
assification of HIV disease. Because a CD4 percentage may be the only
laboratory information available, this study was initiated to determin
e whether the correlation between CD4 percentages and CD4 counts is su
fficiently high to enable these measures to be substituted for each ot
her. Design, setting and patients: One thousand consecutive CD4 measur
ements from the University of Washington (UW) were used to create a mo
del that was tested using datasets of 1000 CD4 measurements each from
Maryland Medical Laboratories (MML) and Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Me
dical Center (Rush). The patients were not selected for age, sex, risk
group or treatment. All patients from MML and Rush were known to be H
IV-positive, while the HIV status of all UW patients was unknown. Resu
lts: The model predicted that a patient with a CD4 percentage greater-
than-or-equal-to 14% would have a CD4 count greater-than-or-equal-to 2
00 x 10(6)/l (if CD4 percentage of 14% was used, 9% of patients would
have a CD4 count greater-than-or-equal-to 200 x 10(6)/l), and a patien
t with a CD4 percentage greater-than-or-equal-to 27% would have a CD4
count greater-than-or-equal-to 500 x 10(6)/l (if CD4 percentage of 27%
was used, 17% of patients would have a CD4 count greater-than-or-equa
l-to 500 x 10(6)/l). Conclusions: These CD4 percentage correlations ma
y be useful when a white blood cell and lymphocyte count are not avail
able to calculate the CD4 count.