Ca. Swanson et al., RELATION OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER RISK TO PAST AND CONTEMPORARY BODY-SIZE AND BODY-FAT DISTRIBUTION, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2(4), 1993, pp. 321-327
In a multicenter case-control study that included 403 cases and 297 co
ntrols, we examined the relation of past and contemporary body size, i
ncluding body fat distribution, to the risk of endometrial cancer. The
relative contributions of past and contemporary body size were assess
ed by examining weight and height histories provided by the subjects.
Anthropometric indicators thought to reflect early environmental influ
ences (e.g., height and sitting height), current weight, and fat distr
ibution patterns were measured directly. Height was not a risk factor
for endometrial cancer, but inexplicably, sitting height was inversely
associated with risk. Weight during early adulthood appeared to be di
rectly related to disease risk, but the association was explained by c
ontemporary weight and thus weight gain during adulthood. While contem
porary weight was associated with risk of endometrial cancer, the effe
ct was restricted to those in the top quartile. Women whose measured w
eight at interview exceeded 78 kg had 2.3 times the risk of those weig
hing less than 58 kg (95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.7). Upper-body
obesity (waist-to-thigh circumference ratio) was a risk factor indepe
ndent of body weight. After adjustment for weight, the relative risks
of endometrial cancer across increasing quartiles of upper-body obesit
y were 1.0, 1.5, 1.8, and 2.6 (P for trend < 0.001). These data indica
te that both obesity and the distribution of adipose tissue accumulate
d during adult life increase endometrial cancer risk substantially.