The electric and magnetic fields from a single plane-wave source on a
one dimensional (1-D) earth, or a plane-wave source polarized parallel
or perpendicular to strike on a two-dimensional (2-D) earth, are orth
ogonal. On a layered earth and in the far-field of a controlled source
, the electric and magnetic fields are also orthogonal. Therefore, ort
hogonality of E and H data is a necessary condition to justify the app
lication of 1-D or 2-D modeling algorithms having a plane wave source.
A strict criterion to prove orthogonality, and thus provide a rationa
le for the choice of interpretation methods, can be defined directly i
n terms of field data. However, field data acquired in the intermediat
e and near-field of any electromagnetic (EM) source are generally not
orthogonal, even on a plane-layered earth. Representing these nonortho
gonal data in an orthogonal coordinate system can be misleading, parti
cularly for the minor axis components of the polarization ellipses. No
northogonality also arises because of 3-D scattering, with one common
example being the electric field response of near surface structure. A
n example of field data illustrates the nonorthogonality in CSAMT meas
urements caused by the response of surficial geology. In these EM data
, the angle between E and H is a sensitive indicator of geological con
tacts and faults. Quantitative analysis of these data can be performed
with the assumptions of a ''bulk'' 1-D earth (i.e., orthogonal E and
H in the far-field) and purely galvanic scattering of the EM fields.