STUDIES ON FORMATION AND STABILITY OF THE (AG)(5)]ASTERISK-D[G(AG)(5)]CENTER-DOT-D[C(TC)(5)] AND (TG)(5)]ASTERISK-D[G(AG)(5)]CENTER-DOT-D[C(TC)(5)] TRIPLE HELICES
Yj. He et al., STUDIES ON FORMATION AND STABILITY OF THE (AG)(5)]ASTERISK-D[G(AG)(5)]CENTER-DOT-D[C(TC)(5)] AND (TG)(5)]ASTERISK-D[G(AG)(5)]CENTER-DOT-D[C(TC)(5)] TRIPLE HELICES, Biopolymers, 41(4), 1997, pp. 431-441
We have targeted the d[G(AG)(5)]. d[C(TC)(5)] duplex for triple format
ion at neutral pH with either d[G(AG)(5)] or d[G(TG)(5)]. Using a comb
ination of gel electrophoresis, uv and CD spectra, mixing and melting
curves, along with DNase I digestion studies, we have investigated the
stability of the 2:1 purpur . pyr tripler, d[G(AG)(5)]*d[G(AG)(5)].
d[C(TC)(5)], in the presence of MgCl2. This tripler melts in a monopha
sic fashion at the same temperature eas the underlying duplex. Althoug
h the uv spectrum changes little upon binding of the second purine sti
-and, the CD spectrum shows significant changes in the wavelength rang
e 200-230 nm and about a 7 nm shift in the positive band near 270 nm.
In contrast, the 1:I:I pur/pyrpur . pyr triplex, d[G(TG)(5)]*d[G(AG)(
5)]. d[C(TC)(5)], is considerably less stable thermally, melting at a
much lower temperature than the underlying duplex, and possesses a CD
spectrum that is entirely: negative from 200 to 300 nm. Ethidium bromi
de undergoes a strong fluorescence enhancement upon binding to each of
these triplexes, and significantly stabilizes the pur/pyrpur . pyr t
ripler. The uv melting and differential scanning calorimetry analysis
of the alternating sequence duplex and purpur . pyr tripler shows tha
t they ale lower in thermodynamic stability than the corresponding 10-
mer d(G(3)A(4)G(3)). d(C3T4C3) duplex and its purpur . pyr triplex un
der identical solution conditions. (C) 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.