The maintenance of sexual reproduction by natural selection poses a pa
radox for evolutionary biology. Assuming ''all else equal,'' a sexual
lineage producing both males and females has a slower intrinsic growth
rate than a clonal lineage producing only females. Hence, clones shou
ld rapidly outcompete their sexual counterparts, unless there are ecol
ogical or mutation-clearing advantages to sex, or unless the all-else-
equal assumption is incorrect. Here we examined the crucial all-else-e
qual assumption using a lake population of freshwater snails (Potamopy
rgus antipodarum) in which both diploid sexual and triploid parthenoge
netic individuals coexist. We contrasted the variation in life-history
traits between sexual and clonal forms to the variation in life histo
ries among habitats and sampling locations. We also conducted a labora
tory experiment in which sexual snails competed with a single clone fo
r 1 yr. We found that size at maturity varied among habitats within th
e lake, but this difference was not attributable to reproductive mode.
There were also no differences among clonal and sexual individuals wi
th respect either to brood size or to the frequency of developmental e
rrors in brooded embryos. Finally, in the laboratory competition exper
iment, the growth rate of sexual individuals was significantly lower t
han the growth rate of snails from a single clone. Taken together, the
se results suggest that the all-else-equal assumption is correct, and
that a cost of males exists in natural sexual populations of these sna
ils.