The factors that contribute to species establishment and decline deter
mine the rate and pattern of successional change. We tested a commonly
held assumption that competitive displacement is responsible for the
loss of species during succession. Manipulative field experiments were
used to examine the effects of interspecific competition on the popul
ation dynamics of Senecio sylvaticus, a winter annual that briefly dom
inates postharvest sites in the western Cascade Range of Oregon. Senec
io increased in density 400-fold from the first to the second growing
season after disturbance but decreased precipitously in year 3 to 10%
of the density and 0.5% of the biomass per plot of the previous year.
Although interspecific competition reduced the cover and biomass of Se
necio during its peak year, it had little or no effect on either the p
opulation increase or decline; the pattern of change was similar among
all treatments. These counterintuitive results underscore the importa
nce of testing, not simply assuming, that interspecific competition is
responsible for the replacement of a species during succession.