H. Strasburger et al., SUSTAINED AND TRANSIENT MECHANISMS IN THE STEADY-STATE VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIAL - ONSET PRESENTATION COMPARED TO PATTERN-REVERSAL, Clinical vision sciences, 8(3), 1993, pp. 211-234
1. There are many reports of a region of reduced amplitude in the spat
ial frequency characteristics of the occipital evoked potential genera
ted by contrast reversing sinusoidal gratings. This effect is especial
ly common at medium spatial frequencies and therefore shows as a notch
in the mean amplitude vs spatial frequency function. 2. In this repor
t we test the idea that the region of reduced amplitude responses may
be due to cancellation of signals dominated by transient and sustained
mechanisms. 3. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) elicited by 8 Hz contr
ast reversal are compared with those obtained using on-off stimulation
at 8 and 16 Hz. Psychophysical contrast thresholds are obtained for t
hese stimuli and the data indicate that 8 Hz contrast reversal is an e
ffective stimulus for both transient and sustained mechanisms, whereas
16 Hz on-off is a poor stimulus for transient mechanisms. 4. The VEP
data for these two conditions support this view; a principal component
analysis of the VEP amplitude data shows that two statistically indep
endent sources contribute to the 8 Hz contrast-reversal response and t
hat the 16 Hz on-off response is derived from a single source. 5. The
obtained factors exhibit spatial tuning as described for sustained and
transient mechanisms. As reported previously, it is shown that for ma
ny, but not all subjects, the 8 Hz contrast-reversing stimulus leads t
o a pronounced notch in the mean amplitude vs spatial frequency respon
se function indicative of the suspected interaction of sustained and t
ransient channels. 6. In general, the 16 Hz on-off response does not s
how the notch, reflecting the activity of a single channel. It is of p
ractical interest that the 16 Hz on-off VEP data exhibit high interind
ividual reliability and that their spatial tuning characteristics matc
h those of the contrast sensitivity function. These properties suggest
that for objective measurement of psychophysical thresholds on-off st
imulation at 16 Hz is likely to yield more reliable data than contrast
reversal.