Ekh. Han et al., A CELL-CYCLE AND MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE-INDEPENDENT GROWTH - CELL-ADHESION AND TGF-BETA-1 CONTROL G1 S TRANSIT SPECIFICALLY/, The Journal of cell biology, 122(2), 1993, pp. 461-471
We have examined cell cycle control of anchorage-independent growth in
nontransformed fibroblasts. In previous studies using G0-synchronized
NRK and NIH-3T3 cells, we showed that anchorage-independent growth is
regulated by an attachment-dependent transition at G1/S that resemble
s the START control point in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisia
e. In the studies reported here, we have synchronized NRK and NIH-3T3
fibroblasts immediately after this attachment-dependent transition to
determine if other portions of the fibroblast cell cycle are similarly
regulated by adhesion. Our results show that S-, G2-, and M-phase pro
gression proceed in the absence of attachment. Thus, we conclude that
the adhesion requirement for proliferation of these cells can be expla
ined in terms of the single START-like transition. In related studies,
we show that TGF-beta1 overrides the attachment-dependent transition
in NRK and AKR-2B fibroblasts (lines in which TGF-beta1 induces anchor
age-independent growth), but not in NIH-3T3 or Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts
(lines in which TGF-beta1 fails to induce anchorage-independent growth
). These results show that (a) adhesion and TGF-beta1 can have similar
effects in stimulating cell cycle progression from GI to S and (b) th
e differential effects of TGF-beta1 on anchorage-independent growth of
various fibroblast lines are directly reflected in the differential e
ffects of the growth factor at G1/S. Finally, we have randomly mutagen
ized NRK fibroblasts to generate mutant lines that have lost their att
achment/TGF-beta1 requirement for G1/S transit while retaining their n
ormal mitogen requirements for proliferation. These clones, which read
ily proliferate in mitogen-supplemented soft agar, appear non-transfor
med in monolayer: they are well spread, nonrefractile, and contact inh
ibited. The existence of this new fibroblast phenotype demonstrates (a
) that the growth factor and adhesion/TGF-beta1 requirements for cell
cycle progression are genetically separable, (b) that the two major co
ntrol points in the fibroblast cell cycle (G0/G1 and G1/S) are regulat
ed by distinct extracellular signals, and (c) that the genes regulatin
g anchorage-independent growth need not be involved in regulating cont
act inhibition, focus formation, or growth factor dependence.