Ag. Adelman et al., A COMPARISON OF DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY WITH BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR LESIONS OF THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY-ARTERY, The New England journal of medicine, 329(4), 1993, pp. 228-233
Background. Restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty.
Directional coronary atherectomy was developed with the expectation th
at it would provide better results than angioplasty, including a lower
rate of restenosis. We undertook a randomized, multicenter trial to c
ompare the rates of restenosis for atherectomy and angioplasty when us
ed to treat lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary
artery. Methods. Of 274 patients referred for first-time, non-surgical
revascularization of lesions of the proximal left anterior descending
coronary artery, 138 were randomly assigned to undergo atherectomy an
d 136 to undergo angioplasty; 257 of 265 eligible patients (97 percent
) underwent follow-up angiography at a median of 5.9 months. Computer-
assisted quantitative measurements of luminal dimensions were determin
ed from the angiograms obtained before and immediately after the proce
dure and at follow-up. The primary end point of restenosis was defined
as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the vessel's diameter at follo
w-up. Results. Quantitative analysis showed that the procedural succes
s rate was higher in patients who underwent atherectomy than in those
who had angioplasty (94 percent vs. 88 percent, P = 0.061); there was
no significant difference in the frequency of major in-hospital compli
cations (5 percent vs. 6 percent). At follow-up, the rate of restenosi
s was 46 percent after atherectomy and 43 percent after angioplasty (P
= 0.71). Despite a larger initial gain in the minimal luminal diamete
r with atherectomy (mean [+/-SD], 1.45+/-0.47 vs. 1.16+/-0.44 mm; P<0.
001), there was a larger late loss (0.79+/-0.61 vs. 0.47+/-0.64 mm, P<
0.001), resulting in a similar minimal luminal diameter in the two gro
ups at follow-up (1.55+/-0.60 vs. 1.61+/-0.68, P = 0.44). The clinical
outcomes at six months were not significantly different between the t
wo groups. Conclusions. The role of atherectomy in percutaneous corona
ry revascularization remains to be fully defined. However, as compared
with angioplasty, atherectomy did not result in better late angiograp
hic or clinical outcomes in patients with lesions of the proximal left
anterior descending coronary artery.