A COMPARISON OF DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY WITH BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR LESIONS OF THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY-ARTERY

Citation
Ag. Adelman et al., A COMPARISON OF DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY WITH BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR LESIONS OF THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY-ARTERY, The New England journal of medicine, 329(4), 1993, pp. 228-233
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00284793
Volume
329
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
228 - 233
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-4793(1993)329:4<228:ACODAW>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background. Restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty. Directional coronary atherectomy was developed with the expectation th at it would provide better results than angioplasty, including a lower rate of restenosis. We undertook a randomized, multicenter trial to c ompare the rates of restenosis for atherectomy and angioplasty when us ed to treat lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Methods. Of 274 patients referred for first-time, non-surgical revascularization of lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, 138 were randomly assigned to undergo atherectomy an d 136 to undergo angioplasty; 257 of 265 eligible patients (97 percent ) underwent follow-up angiography at a median of 5.9 months. Computer- assisted quantitative measurements of luminal dimensions were determin ed from the angiograms obtained before and immediately after the proce dure and at follow-up. The primary end point of restenosis was defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the vessel's diameter at follo w-up. Results. Quantitative analysis showed that the procedural succes s rate was higher in patients who underwent atherectomy than in those who had angioplasty (94 percent vs. 88 percent, P = 0.061); there was no significant difference in the frequency of major in-hospital compli cations (5 percent vs. 6 percent). At follow-up, the rate of restenosi s was 46 percent after atherectomy and 43 percent after angioplasty (P = 0.71). Despite a larger initial gain in the minimal luminal diamete r with atherectomy (mean [+/-SD], 1.45+/-0.47 vs. 1.16+/-0.44 mm; P<0. 001), there was a larger late loss (0.79+/-0.61 vs. 0.47+/-0.64 mm, P< 0.001), resulting in a similar minimal luminal diameter in the two gro ups at follow-up (1.55+/-0.60 vs. 1.61+/-0.68, P = 0.44). The clinical outcomes at six months were not significantly different between the t wo groups. Conclusions. The role of atherectomy in percutaneous corona ry revascularization remains to be fully defined. However, as compared with angioplasty, atherectomy did not result in better late angiograp hic or clinical outcomes in patients with lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery.