Background. There is uncertainty regarding if, when, and how localized
prostate cancer should be managed. Methods. To examine evidence of a
beneficial effect of aggressive treatment on metastatic failure and di
sease-specific mortality in clinically localized prostate cancer, the
authors compiled data from the literature since 1980 regarding radical
prostatectomy, external radiation therapy, and deferred treatment. Re
sults. The weighted mean of reported disease-specific survival at 10 y
ears was 93% for radical prostatectomy, 83% for deferred treatment, an
d 74% for external radiation therapy. To broaden the database we have
also computed, from the recorded number of patients who died of prosta
te cancer and the number of person-years at risk, a calculated disease
-specific survival at 10 years of 93% for radical prostatectomy, 83% f
or deferred treatment, and 62% for external radiation therapy. The dat
a suggest a favorable treatment effect with regard to disease-specific
mortality for radical prostatectomy, but not for external radiation t
herapy at 10 years of follow-up. This observation must be tempered by
the absence of convincing randomized trials and by the possibility of
selection biases in the reviewed studies. Conclusions. As judged from
our analysis, clinically localized prostate cancer often has a protrac
ted course associated with a significant competing mortality and margi
nal benefit from radical prostatectomy at 10 years in terms of the end
points used.