CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS USING COMBINATION ASSAY OF TUMOR-MARKERS FOR PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA
Citation
S. Saito et al., CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS USING COMBINATION ASSAY OF TUMOR-MARKERS FOR PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA, Cancer, 72(2), 1993, pp. 381-388
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
SICI code
0008-543X(1993)72:2<381:CUOCDU>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background. There has been extensive use of serum tumor markers in dia
gnosing pancreatic adenocarcinoma. There is no tumor marker, however,
that alone has sufficient diagnostic accuracy. It is necessary to know
which combination of tumor markers should be used to detect pancreati
c cancer, with respect to clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness.
Methods. Serum levels of 17 kinds of tumor markers were determined in
145 patients and 40 healthy volunteers. Thirty-five patients with prov
en pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 32 with benign pancreatobiliary dise
ase (14 chronic pancreatitis and 18 biliary stones) were selected. For
analysis of the usefulness of each tumor marker to differentiate thes
e two groups, scatterplot and relative operating characteristic (ROC)
analyses were used. A multivariate discriminant system to differentiat
e these two groups was developed using stepwise discriminant analysis
by backward elimination selection. Results. The significance of each t
umor marker varied according to the tumor volume. By ROC analysis, the
markers were divided into four subgroups according to their usefulnes
s in discriminating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from benign pancreatobil
iary disease. A discriminant system consisting of two different discri
minant functions using nine tumor markers (CA 19-9, DUPAN-2, TPA, elas
tase-1, lipase, amylase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosp
hatase, and lactate dehydrogenase) was developed and designated CAMPAS
-P; it could differentiate between all 35 cases of pancreatic adenocar
cinoma and 32 cases of benign pancreatobiliary disease. On the other h
and, CAMPAS-P showed a low positive rate in pancreatic tumors of unusu
al histologic type, and poor organ-specific diagnostic ability in vari
ous digestive organ malignancies. Conclusions. CAMPAS-P may be very us
eful for differential diagnosis between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and
benign pancreatobiliary disease.