Gender-based discrimination or harms represent an important set of pro
blems for policy communities. Because policy communities respond to rh
etorical arguments about policy ideas, feminist scholars to be concern
ed about the persuasion value of their policy-relevant arguments. This
paper examines the persuasion value-of arguments based on feminist na
rratives. Narratives look to women's experiences as key resources for
social investigation, but they involve rhetorical tradeoffs. Some of t
he important rhetorical advantages of narratives are partially offset
by features characteristic of this research approach.