P. Piedbois et M. Buyse, WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM A METAANALYSIS OF TRIALS TESTING THE MODULATION OF 5-FU BY LEUCOVORIN, Annals of oncology, 4, 1993, pp. 190000015-190000019
Background and design: We previously reported a meta-analysis of all r
andomized clinical trials comparing 5-FU to 5-FU plus intravenous d.l.
leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Results:
The meta-analysis confirmed the advantage of 5-FU/LV over 5-FU alone
in terms of response rate: overall, the response rate was 11% with 5-F
U alone vs 23% with 5-FU/LV (p < 10(-7)). At the same time, it was sho
wed that tumor regression can not be considered a surrogate end point
for survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: no significa
nt survival advantage was observed for patients allocated to 5-FU/LV.
The present paper focuses on the interest of meta-analysis to study th
e role of the biomodulation of 5-FU by LV. This approach is compared w
ith the analysis of individual clinical trials in terms of power, bias
and credibility. It is argued that for the meta-analysis to be reliab
le, individual patient data from all available studies must be used, r
ather than summary data extracted from published papers. Conclusion: I
t is concluded that meta-analysis is very useful as a tool to explore
and summarize available data on a given clinical problem, though its p
urpose is not to recommend any treatment modality. This meta-analysis
has confirmed both the benefit of biomodulation of 5-FU by LV, and the
limitations of the current modalities to impact significantly on over
all patient survival. Further laboratory and clinical research is warr
anted on the biomodulation of 5-FU by LV.