A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TRANSURETHRAL MICROWAVE THERMOTHERAPY

Citation
Jd. Nawrocki et al., A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TRANSURETHRAL MICROWAVE THERMOTHERAPY, British Journal of Urology, 79(3), 1997, pp. 389-393
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00071331
Volume
79
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
389 - 393
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1331(1997)79:3<389:ARCTOT>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective To establish the short term clinical and urodynamic effect o f transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in men with symptomatic uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using a randomized c ontrolled trial comparing the treatment with both 'placebo-like' and u ntreated control groups. Patients and methods The study comprised 120 symptomatic patients with BPH who were candidates for transurethral re section and TUMT, They were randomized to one of three groups: group 1 underwent a standard TUMT, group 2 underwent a simulated treatment id entical to group 1 but with no emission of microwaves and group 3 rece ived no treatment. The treatment of the first two groups was 'double-b lind' and the heat experienced by the patients during treatment was si mulated in both, Patients were assessed on entry to the study and 6 mo nths after treatment using an identical protocol to measure the Americ an Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, maximum urinary flow ra te (Q(max)), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), minimum urethral o pening pressure (p(muo)) and maximum detrusor pressure (p(det max)). R esults In the untreated group there were no clinically or statisticall y significant changes in the median AUA symptom score, Q(max), PVR, p( muo) and p(det max). In group 1 the AUA score changed significantly, f rom 19 to 9.5, but the Q(max), PVR, p(muo) and p(det max) did not. In group 2, the AUA score also changed significantly, from 17.5 to 9.5, b ut Q(max), PVR, p(muo) and p(det max) did not. Conclusion The untreate d control group showed no clinically relevant deterioration or improve ment. The standard and simulated TUMT groups showed little clinically relevant improvement in 'objective' variables, while the clinically si gnificant symptom improvement was of a similar magnitude in both group s.