The potential explosion hazard of fuels is quantified by methods in wh
ich the explosive potential of a flammable fuel air mixture is express
ed as an equivalent explosive charge whose blast characteristics are k
nown. In this paper, the two most current methods are described and de
monstrated in a simple case study. TNT-equivalency methods have been w
idely used for this purpose for a long time now. Generally speaking, T
NT-equivalency methods state a proportional relationship between the q
uantity of fuel available and the weight of a TNT charge expressing th
e cloud's explosive potential. However, fundamental and practical obje
ctions are met if the TNT-equivalency concept is used for vapour cloud
explosion hazard assessment. To some extent, these difficulties are r
emedied in an alternative approach, the multi-energy method. In the mu
lti-energy method, a flammable fuel air mixture is considered to be ex
plosive only if it is in a partially confined, congested or obstructed
area in the cloud. The explosive potential of the fuel air mixture in
the various partially confined, congested or obstructed regions can b
e expressed as a corresponding number of equivalent fuel air charges.
The multi-energy concept is shown to be a flexible concept which makes
it possible to incorporate current experimental data and advanced com
putational methods into the procedure of vapour cloud explosion hazard
analysis.