PIVOTAL ROLE OF HEPATOCELLULAR REGENERATION IN THE ULTIMATE HEPATOTOXICITY OF CCL4 IN CHLORDECONE-PRETREATED, MIREX-PRETREATED, OR PHENOBARBITAL-PRETREATED RATS
Prs. Kodavanti et al., PIVOTAL ROLE OF HEPATOCELLULAR REGENERATION IN THE ULTIMATE HEPATOTOXICITY OF CCL4 IN CHLORDECONE-PRETREATED, MIREX-PRETREATED, OR PHENOBARBITAL-PRETREATED RATS, Toxicologic pathology, 20(4), 1992, pp. 556-569
Our earlier histomorphometric and biochemical studies suggested that t
he progressive phase of the interactive toxicity of chlordecone (CD) CCl4 involves suppression of hepatocellular regeneration. The objecti
ve of the present work was to correlate hepatocellular regeneration wi
th CCl4 (100 mul/kg)-induced hepatotoxicity in rats maintained for 15
days on a normal (N) diet, relative to the regenerative response in ra
ts maintained on a diet containing either 10 ppm CD, 225 ppm phenobarb
ital (PB), or 10 ppm mirex (M). Hepatocellular regeneration was assess
ed by measuring DNA and H-3-thymidine (H-3-T) incorporation, followed
by autoradiographic analysis of liver sections. Hepatotoxicity was ass
essed by measuring plasma transaminases (aspartate and alanine) follow
ed by histopathological observations of liver sections for necrotic, s
wollen, and lipid-laden cells. Lethality studies were also carried out
to assess the consequence of hepatotoxicity on animal survival. Dieta
ry 10 ppm CD potentiated the hepatotoxicity of CCl4 to a greater exten
t than PB or M, as evidenced by elevations in plasma enzymes. Although
the serum enzymes were significantly elevated in PB rats in contrast
to the slight elevations in N and M rats, they returned to normal leve
ls by 96 hr. However, serum enzyme elevations in CD rats were progress
ive with time until death of the animals. Actual liver injury by CCl4
was greater in PB- than in CD-pretreated rats, as evidenced by histopa
thological observations. A 100% mortality occurred in CD-pretreated ra
ts at 60 hr after CCl4 administration, whereas no mortality occurred i
n either N-, M-, or PB-pretreated rats, indicating recovery from liver
injury. Hepatocellular nuclear DNA levels were significantly decrease
d starting at 6 hr after CCl4 administration to CD-pretreated rats, bu
t not in M- or PB-pretreated rats. H-3-T incorporation into nuclear DN
A as well as percentage of labeled cells showed a biphasic increase in
N rats: 1 at 1-2 hr, and the other at 36-48 hr after CCl4 administrat
ion. However, only 1 peak of H-3-T incorporation at 36-48 hr was obser
ved in the CD + CCl4 combination, which was also significantly lower w
hen compared to that observed after the M or PB + CCl4 combination tre
atments. These findings suggest that there is recovery in N-, PB-, or
M-pretreated rats from CCl4-induced injury by virtue of the stimulated
hepatocellular regeneration and tissue repair. In CD-pretreated rats,
CCl4 toxicity is progressive because of mitigated hepatocellular rege
neration (at 2-6 hr), supporting the concept that hepatocellular regen
eration plays a critical role in determining whether hepatotoxicity be
comes permissively progressive or actively regressive, owing to tissue
repair mechanisms. In the absence of hepatocellular regeneration and
tissue repair, progressive liver injury leads to sustained hepatic fai
lure (24 hr), culminating in animal death. These findings underscore t
he importance of assessing additional parameters of hepatobiology indi
cative of the ultimate outcome of toxicity rather than relying solely
on indices of liver injury, particularly during the inflictive phase o
f chemically-induced liver injury.