Pj. Biggs et al., DOES A GENOTOXIC CARCINOGEN CONTRIBUTE TO HUMAN BREAST-CANCER - THE VALUE OF MUTATIONAL SPECTRA IN UNRAVELING THE ETIOLOGY OF CANCER, Mutagenesis, 8(4), 1993, pp. 275-283
The p53 tumour suppressor gene is turning out to be a useful reporter
for the stigmata of past genotoxic exposure. About half of all human c
ancers contain p53 mutations most of which occur in those regions (exo
ns 5 - 8) of the gene that are highly conserved during evolution. Muta
tions are mainly of the missense type and their frequency and distribu
tion vary among different kinds of cancer. The ability to detect all s
ix possible base-substitution mutations in the p53 gene in human tumou
rs makes it possible to construct mutational spectra for different can
cers at a locus clearly implicated in carcinogenesis. Transitions at o
ne particular hotspot-the CpG dinucleotide-occur frequently in many ca
ncers and may reflect endogenous mutation. A reduction in the proporti
on of CpG mutations at the expense, for example, of an increase in GC
to TA transversions may signal the effect of an exogenous mutagen. We
exploited these features of the p53 gene to examine the evidence that
a previously unsuspected genotoxic exposure may contribute to the high
incidence of breast cancer in women living in rich industrialized cou
ntries. We compiled a mutational spectrum of p53 from 120 breast cance
rs and compared it with the spectrum from 145 colorectal cancers and 2
46 lung cancers. A germline p53 spectrum was constructed using data fr
om 27 patients. Two hundred germline mutations in the haemophilia B ge
ne served as a 'background' spectrum. The spectrum of mutations in the
p53 gene in breast cancer revealed a reduction in the proportion of G
-->A and C-->T transitions at CpG dinucleotides compared with colorect
al cancer (P < 0.0005) and an increase in G-->T transversions (P < 0.0
005). Other mutations showed no significant differences from colorecta
l cancer or germline mutational spectra. In breast cancer, as in lung
cancer, G-->T transversions were over-represented at CpG dinucleotides
and there was also a G-->T hotspot at codon 157 that was not seen in
colorectal cancer. Moreover, G-->T transversions were much more common
on the coding strand, as in lung cancer. Thus, the mutational spectru
m in the p53 gene of breast cancer differs significantly from that tho
ught to be attributable to endogenous or background mutagenic processe
s. It resembles more closely the lung cancer spectrum, which is probab
ly caused by exogenous mutagenic chemicals. These findings pose the fo
llowing questions. Is a mutagenic agent of exogenous or endogenous ori
gin involved in the aetiology of breast cancer? Is the breast epitheli
um and/or its neoplastic derivatives less efficient at repairing DNA d
amage than are colorectal epithelial cells?