Gl. Cooper et al., FURTHER-STUDIES OF THE APPLICATION OF LIVE SALMONELLA-ENTERITIDIS AROA VACCINES IN CHICKENS, Veterinary record, 133(2), 1993, pp. 31-36
A model was developed to simulate the lateral spread of Salmonella ent
eritidis infection among chickens. One group of newly hatched chicks w
as vaccinated orally with S enteritidis aroA. At three weeks old naive
chickens were infected with a wild-type strain of S enteritidis and b
rought into contact with separate groups of aroA vaccinated chickens a
nd unvaccinated control chickens. The vaccinated chickens were well pr
otected against colonisation of the gut by the wild-type strain wherea
s the control group became heavily colonised. The IgG responses to a l
ipopolysaccharide extract of S enteritidis in the vaccinated chickens
indicated a limitation of invasion from the gut. Chickens vaccinated o
rally at one day old with S enteritidis aroA were not protected agains
t oral or intravenous challenge at eight weeks old with a wild-type st
rain of S typhimurium. A group of newly hatched female chicks was vacc
inated orally with S enteritidis aroA and again at two weeks old. A se
cond group also received oral booster doses at 16 and 18 weeks. When c
hallenged intravenously with a wild-type strain of S enteritidis at 23
weeks old there was a significant reduction in the numbers of this st
rain in the spleens, livers, ovaries and caeca of both vaccinated grou
ps. Booster vaccination at 16 and 18 weeks of age induced the greatest
protection of the caeca.